Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Alternative proposal for closed shadow DOM (#499) from Anne van Kesteren on 2016-05-16 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from May 2016)

From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 06:34:32 -0700
To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Cc:
Message-ID: <w3c/webcomponents/issues/499/219425843@github.com>

@dylanb in practice, the buck ends with implementers. However, according to the W3C it's the Director, so I suppose you could appeal to them, but I don't think any of that will change much here.

I didn't really reply to your summary of the arguments since I didn't quite know what to make of it.

Anyway, I will unsubscribe from this issue now since I feel like I've been repeating myself too many times.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/499#issuecomment-219425843

Received on Monday, 16 May 2016 13:35:02 UTC