Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Alternative proposal for closed shadow DOM (#499)

Following a slight tangent: is there any indication that those naughty developers making widespread use of `shadowRoot` will suddenly be persuaded not to because they'll need an extra 4 line hack?

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/499#issuecomment-219226201

Received on Saturday, 14 May 2016 15:26:30 UTC