Re: [w3c/editing] Should we propose "::caret" pseudo-element to CSS WG? (#158)

I am not convinced that the ::caret pseudo is the right approach. There are a few things you may want to tweak about the caret, but I don't think most existing CSS properties make sense to apply to it, nor that most of the things you'd want to do to the caret can be expressed in terms of existing CSS properties.

I do think we should be able to control the caret more than we currently can, and as the editor of [css-ui level 4](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui-4/) I'm interested in pursuing various extensions.

At this stage, the most useful for me would be to get information about use cases. The more examples we have about things people want to do with the caret but currently cannot, the better we can design solutions to these problems.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/158#issuecomment-265656523