- From: Jungkee Song <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:56:18 -0700
- To: slightlyoff/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 16 August 2016 12:56:46 UTC
> Currently install is do-something-by-default, while fetch event is do-nothing-by-default. I think fetch is also do-something-by-default: respond to the client after all regardless the fetch event handler gave a response to it or not. But I agree it was an oversight that we had made `throw` lead to the installation failure. @n8schloss, would it still make sense to change the behavior of install to not fail upon `throw` in install event's handlers? > @n8schloss are you using throw outside of waitUntil in the install event? @jakearchibald, I don't think I understood your point here. Can you explain what your point was in this question? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/896#issuecomment-240093019
Received on Tuesday, 16 August 2016 12:56:46 UTC