Re: [webidl] Promise type on an attribute should be allowed (#71) from Cameron McCormack on 2015-10-29 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from October 2015)

From: Cameron McCormack <notifications@github.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 23:54:12 -0700
To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <heycam/webidl/issues/71/152097806@github.com>

Sounds reasonable. What about linking it to http://heycam.github.io/webidl/#dfn-object-type and then adding promise types to that definition?

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/71#issuecomment-152097806

Received on Thursday, 29 October 2015 06:54:39 UTC