Re: [ServiceWorker] Pattern for handling fingerprinted assets in cache? (#657)

> Tag feels a bit of a specific as a fix here. If we see this pattern we can bring back prefixMatch as I've run into a few cases I'd have liked to have used it.

>From an implementation point of view, something like a tag would be easier to implement.  `prefixMatch()` is going to be a de-opt which is why we removed it in the first place.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/657#issuecomment-151908465

Received on Wednesday, 28 October 2015 16:56:26 UTC