Re: [ServiceWorker] Pattern for handling fingerprinted assets in cache? (#657)

@brittanystoroz (firstly, really sorry it's taken so long to get to this)

> I get that Service Workers would remove the need for fingerprinting files like that

I don't think that's true. You can fight good http caching with SW, but it's not the optimal thing to do.

Tag feels a bit of a specific as a fix here. If we see this pattern we can bring back `prefixMatch` as I've run into a few cases I'd have liked to have used it.

Going to file this under future ideas.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/657#issuecomment-151767847