Re: [img-conversion] Encode and decode should take/produce streams (#15)

@domenic, I've done some work already setting up the specification to be algorithmic. See PR. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 15, 2015, at 3:51 PM, Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com> wrote:
> 
> @marcoscaceres I can give this a shot, although it will be about a month before I can really get to it. I also need to circle back to those writable stream API changes which are currently just open bugs and not incorporated into the spec.
> 
> @AshleyScirra If implementers prefer, I think it'd be OK to continue with the current spec as-is, and later rephrase it on top of the lower-level streaming primitives. (Well, that's assuming you get around to writing the spec. Right now it lists a few methods but doesn't actually specify what they do.)
> 
> Alternately maybe implementers would prefer to wait for the streams stuff to shake out before doing any work on the higher-level sugar methods proposed here, in which case ... I'll try to hurry!
> 
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
> 


---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/WICG/img-conversion/issues/15#issuecomment-148520347