Re: [img-conversion] Encode and decode should take/produce streams (#15)

@marcoscaceres I can give this a shot, although it will be about a month before I can really get to it. I also need to circle back to those writable stream API changes which are currently just open bugs and not incorporated into the spec.

@AshleyScirra If implementers prefer, I think it'd be OK to continue with the current spec as-is, and later rephrase it on top of the lower-level streaming primitives. (Well, that's assuming you get around to writing the spec. Right now it lists a few methods but doesn't actually specify what they do.)

Alternately maybe implementers would prefer to wait for the streams stuff to shake out before doing any work on the higher-level sugar methods proposed here, in which case ... I'll try to hurry!

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/WICG/img-conversion/issues/15#issuecomment-148502514