- From: Hayato Ito <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 20:37:01 -0700
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 1 June 2015 03:37:43 UTC
I am not saying that we have to rename `::content` to `::distributed`. I am saying `::distributed` is much better than `::slot`, *relatively*. `::content` is still better than `::distributed` and `::slot-content`. I think `::slot-content` is just redundant. I want to write `slot::content` rather than `slot::slot-content`. What problems are you trying to solve by renaming `::content` to `::slot-content`? Anyway, now I think everyone can understand why `::slot` is not a good name here, as I pointed out in the previous comment, this kind of renaming is a low priority task for me. I hope the discussion would settle down with a reasonable result. I think everyone doesn't like a renaming again and again. :( --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/92#issuecomment-107298471
Received on Monday, 1 June 2015 03:37:43 UTC