- From: Waldir Pimenta <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:16:43 -0700
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 17 July 2015 22:17:10 UTC
Just adding that the expectation is a quite reasonable one. Quoting [this article](http://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/webcomponents/imports/): > Think about how you load different types of resources on the web. For JS, we have `<script src>`. For CSS, your go-to is probably `<link rel="stylesheet">`. For images it's `<img>`. Video has `<video>`. Audio, `<audio>`.... Get to the point! The majority of the web's content has a simple and *declarative* way to load itself. Not so for HTML. (...) See the irony? **The web's most basic content, HTML, requires the greatest amount of effort to work with.** For now the closest we can get to that is [seamless iframes](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#attr-iframe-seamless), but the `seamless` attribute still needs to be emulated using CSS until it becomes [supported by the browsers](http://caniuse.com/#feat=iframe-seamless). --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/280#issuecomment-122433178
Received on Friday, 17 July 2015 22:17:10 UTC