Re: [streams] Port precise flow control to writable streams (#318)

> Maybe one fix is that if n > highWaterMark, we notify you anyway, when desiredSize = highWaterMark.

Ah, yeah. That works. Notification threshold would be set to min(hightWaterMark, n)

> Hmm, what do you think of making it work like (1) or (2)?

(1) and (2) would work but changed signal is more flexible (yeah, HWM=0 would behave as them). What's the reason you preferred them than changed signal? Simplicity? I understand that the name "ready" isn't good name for "changed" signal, though.

> UA created streams

Yeah. When HWM of 0 is used, desiredSize would be 0 or negative. The problem is that pipeTo() should be designed to (possibly by having some mode to) be able to push data to such a writable stream.

"Push only when non-negative" would work?

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/318#issuecomment-136336642