Re: [ServiceWorker] Expanded on the update() Note: (#616)

@jeffposnick thanks for having suggested a better wording. Recently after the latest f2f, it has been sorted out that update() obeys the same browser cache rule as other update paths: https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/514#issuecomment-130491914. And the note has been removed from the text as such.

For
> I hadn't previously been clear on whether it was the browser HTTP cache that was consulted or some service worker-specific cache

The fetched service worker script resource is stored apart from the browser cache and has no expiration in and of itself until it's replaced by a new version through one of the update paths.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/pull/616#issuecomment-135335540