- From: ojan <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 07:16:44 -0700
- To: w3c/editing <editing@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/editing/issues/73/135036321@github.com>
Moving the caret movement types to beforeselectionchange makes sense to me. That seems orthogonal to renaming the event though. I don't think the renaming makes sense. As you say, we already have an input event. If we rename these, then every input will end up having to fire beforeEdit, edit *and* input in addition to whatever keyboard events need to fire. This is bad for performance and bad for authors (one more event type they need to learn). Also, Blink/WebKit implement <input> as a wrapper around contentEditable. IMO, that's a good thing and it's one that we should build on and encourage all browsers to move to. Conceptually, the end result should be that <input> is a shadow DOM wrapper around a contentEditable=events element. I wasn't there on the second day of the F2F when this was discussed, but as I understand it the concerns are: 1. We don't want to issue beforeInput/input events with a "bold" editType on <input> 2. targetRange doesn't work on <input>. I agree with those concerns, but would be happier solving them in a different way. The beforeInput/input events just shouldn't fire for <input> if the user hits ctrl+b, etc and targetRange should be null. This fits into the platform layering model of <input> being a wrapper around contentEditable because conceptually: 1. The code that dispatches beforeInput/input for ctrl+b would be a feature of the code that implements contentEditable=typing on top of contentEditable=events 2. The code that fills targetRange would know to leave it out for closed shadow roots (once we finally get those specced and implemented). --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/73#issuecomment-135036321
Received on Wednesday, 26 August 2015 14:17:16 UTC