- From: Piotrek Koszuliński <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 08:44:12 -0700
- To: w3c/editing <editing@noreply.github.com>
Received on Saturday, 22 August 2015 15:44:41 UTC
> * After inline elements that are not text nodes. > * Before inline elements that are not text nodes and that do not have a `previousSibling`. I find this a bit confusing: 1. Elements cannot be text nodes, so I think that saying "After inline elements" is enough. 2. The second point mentions `previousSibling`, while the first one doesn't. Is there a specific reason why it is formulated this way? Couldn't it be formulated this way: "After and before inline elements"? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/74
Received on Saturday, 22 August 2015 15:44:41 UTC