- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 21:50:42 -0700
- To: whatwg/storage <storage@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2015 04:51:12 UTC
I'm a little confused what the issue is here. @inexorabletash, you said > If a site assumed persistentPermission() => "granted" indicates the storage is persistent it would not bother to call requestPersistent() Is that actually a bad thing in any way? It seems fine. The idea is that authors could write: ```js navigator.storage.persistentPermission() .then(function(permission) { return permission === 'granted'; }) .then(function(hasPersistent) { // ... }); ``` and it would be equivalent to ```js navigator.storage.persistentPermissionOnlyIfNoPrompt() .then(function(hasPersistent) { // ... }); ``` --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/storage/issues/9#issuecomment-132444630
Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2015 04:51:12 UTC