Re: [editing] Definition of "Invisible elements" is vague (#68)

> Ideally I'd like Gecko and Trident to join the discussions too (maybe it's time to ping Trident folks again?), but at least when a stable spec approaches to CR or such milestones, we can expect them to review the spec and object if any.

Agreed. I have tried to contact absolutely everyone in this space, and last I spoke to some Trident people (in May/June) they said someone would eventually join this effort again. Luckily Benjamin was able to collect a lot of input from Microsoft internal projects before he left, so hopefully that means we already are covering a lot of their needs. The F2F may be another forum to figure out who else should get involved in these discussions.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/68#issuecomment-132237352