- From: Johannes Wilm <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 14:17:27 -0700
- To: w3c/editing <editing@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 3 August 2015 21:17:55 UTC
As for a practical proposal: Could we give access to the exact same execCommand copy/cut function just under a different function name for contentEditable=Intentions? This should mean that it would have the same amount of security/insecurity as what you currently do with execCommand, and AFAIK it is rather unique in being the only functions for which we would need this from all of execCommand. Basically a "trigger copy/cut intent" function. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/61#issuecomment-127408396
Received on Monday, 3 August 2015 21:17:55 UTC