[Bug 22646] So if we want to say on a per-object basis whether it ought to be exposed to workers (which I think is useful) lets introduce "exposed to document environments", "exposed to worker environments", and [...]

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22646

--- Comment #18 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> ---
(In reply to Ian 'Hixie' Hickson from comment #17)
> Ok, I welcome review of the above. I'm especially interested in how I used
> it here, where there's an attribute with a different definition for workers
> than it has for Window:
> 
>    http://whatwg.org/html/#the-messageevent-interfaces

Ah so that is a problem, I guess.  Currently I disallow any duplicate attribute
names on an interface, not looking at [Exposed].  Given that the dictionary
still has the union, and that as with XHR.send() still having Document in the
types is OK, do you need to split the attribute in two here?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2014 00:44:07 UTC