- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:54:17 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24072 --- Comment #9 from Arun <arun@mozilla.com> --- (In reply to Anne from comment #8) > I'm not sure I care about the particulars. I just want the low-level model > we need to operate on to be clear. Other than that I suppose we should focus > on simplicity for developers. > > So a Blob either has an association with a bag of bits or is closed. > > A Blob has a size which is the length of the associated bag of bits or 0 if > there is no association. > > A Blob has a read operation. If there is an associated bag of bits this > operation can fail for reasons listed in the specification now that would be > better placed as part of this operation I think. If there is no associated > bag of bits we could always return the empty byte sequence or return > "closed" or some such and let the higher-level API deal with it. Failing > might be okay given that the read operation can fail anyway. Some testing on > what browsers do today might be worth doing. Bug 24339 is for this spec fix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 20 January 2014 19:54:19 UTC