- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 16:29:16 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25412 --- Comment #14 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> --- > What would you consider "correctly"? That's a good question. My main criterion is "A C++ implementation of this algorithm will not crash". So no getting properties from null pointers, for example, or putting the iterator in a state that the spec doesn't expect it to be in. Past that, I don't really care about _sanity_ in this case, because as you point out there won't be any no matter what. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 24 April 2014 16:29:18 UTC