- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 10:21:59 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25412 --- Comment #15 from Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name> --- I just looked over the spec briefly, and am pretty sure nothing there would be made more problematic by removing the recursion guard. As it stands, implementers have to be very careful here anyway, just like with mutation events, and e.g. hold strong references to everything they want to reference after the filter runs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 25 April 2014 10:22:01 UTC