- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 01:54:04 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23887 --- Comment #17 from Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org> --- (In reply to Steve Orvell from comment #15) > (In reply to Olli Pettay from comment #13) > > Unless I'm missing something in the spec, > > the current setup let's also > > the same event to be handled twice in an insertion point. > > Handling the event twice would be bad, no argument there. If this happens in any cases, that means there is a serious error in the spec. > > > I know that setup is odd, but nothing seem to prevent adding shadow host > > under an insertion point > > I'm not quite sure I follow this. Is SH2 a child of IP1? If so, it's > fallback content in the insertion point and would only render if Child was > not selected by IP1 so I'm not quite sure how the resulting event flow could > occur. Right. In this case, SH2 is not used at all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 28 November 2013 01:54:06 UTC