- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 23:59:56 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23839 --- Comment #3 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> --- (In reply to Dominic Cooney from comment #2) > Two questions: > > 1. The link mentions in Comment 1 mentions initializers running in > templates; this proposal is to not share a registration context at all and > hence not run any callbacks. Is not doing any prototype swizzling/callbacks > just the logical consequence of not running the initializer? Right. > 2. If the registration context is not shared, does the template document get > a blank registration context ('register' will work when used on a template > document) or not? ('register' will throw when used on a template document.) Just a blank registration context. Technically, it's not blank. When we spec the Registry object API, we'll say that at the time of creating a template document, we pour all of the built-in HTML element definitions into this context (just like with a Document created with XHR). The authors should be able to do the same type of sharing with their elements using that API. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 18 November 2013 23:59:58 UTC