- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 08:02:01 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22344 --- Comment #42 from Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org> --- Thank you! I understand your argument. But, at this point, I don't think there is a strong reason for '<shadow></shadow>' should be equivalent to '<shadow><content></content></shadow>'. Let me explain my feeling: - Forget <content>! Let's make '<shadow></shadow>' behave nicely! A <shadow> element is already so special. It's okay that there is no equivalent syntax for <shadow></shadow>. We will get real benefits from it! Yay! :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 7 November 2013 08:02:04 UTC