- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:09:44 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23431 --- Comment #9 from Arun <arun@mozilla.com> --- (In reply to Anne from comment #8) > Arun, all URLs should be defined and created equal. There's only one URL > parser after all. Yes, but blob: is already in implementations and shipping, and I'm not clear exactly what you're suggesting. We already defer to fetch for parts of blob: URL ref culling. So: 1. Are you suggesting that url.spec.whatwg.org adds other schemes to the existing scheme list in Section 5 (that is, http://url.spec.whatwg.org/#urls)? If so, I support that, and think you may as well add some riders such as mediastream:, which ought to behave exactly like blob: as far as schemes go, since mediastream: is essentially blob: by another name. Then, when that becomes authoritative, we should deprecate what I have in the File API (which itself may be deprecated by any specs that emerge out of the ongoing discussion about Streams). 2. Or, are you suggesting I rewrite the blob: definition in terms of url.spec.whatwg.org in the File API spec.? That would have been useful feedback a bit earlier in the game. I'm not totally sure what it buys us now. Implementations are still free to use "one URL parser." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2013 21:09:46 UTC