- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 17:17:01 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23726
Bug ID: 23726
Summary: Integration between XMLHttpRequest and Streams API
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Streams API
Assignee: tyoshino@google.com
Reporter: tyoshino@google.com
QA Contact: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org
Current ED tries to support upload-with-Stream usage by making send() to accept
a Stream as its argument. We can also choose to let XHR provide a
WritableByteStream.
For example, if we can make send() to return a WritableByteStream, it'll be
streamForUpload = xhr.send();
source.pipe(streamForUpload);
Current extension approach is easy. But maybe now we should revisit this and
discuss which is better not only about XHR but for each API and if possible
figure out good practice in general.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2013 17:17:07 UTC