- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 02:24:08 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22344 --- Comment #28 from Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org> --- (In reply to Steve Orvell from comment #27) > I propose we make: > > <shadow></shadow> > > act like this: > > <shadow><content></content></shadow> > > Then this change is backwards compatible, and we avoid an extra node in this > very common case. Yeah, I once thought that, but I gave up that idea at early stage since it's just like a syntax sugar with a implicit rule. I don't have strong opinion for that, but that makes the spec complicated. I thought explicit is better than implicit. > > If the author really does not want to distribute elements to a <shadow>, the > author would make sure to select them before the <shadow>. This would most > likely happen naturally. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2013 02:24:11 UTC