- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 21:29:52 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20982
Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |LATER
--- Comment #1 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> From annevk:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013JanMar/0374.html
>
> --
> I was wondering if this rewrite of 3.1-3.3 is correct:
>
> 1. Let CONTEXT be null.
> 2. If ANCESTOR is an insertion point, set CONTEXT to the top-most item
> in STACK that is not an insertion point, if any.
> 3. If STACK is empty, push ANCESTOR on STACK.
>
> I think this would be quite a bit clearer.
The new algo is not going to work quite the same way, since we need to always
push an item on stack when ANCESTOR is an insertion point.
Let me close this for now, I need to rework that whole algo anyway.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 9 May 2013 21:29:54 UTC