- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 06:55:20 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22394 --- Comment #3 from Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org> --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Hi Dimitri, > > > > Could you take a look at the proposal? > > > > It's incomplete, but I'd like to know whether the strategy and technique > > used in the proposal is good or not at this point. > > > > Let's ignore the details for now, which I can fix that. > > I left bunches of comments. Top concern is that we should not do the > refactoring as one giant patch, which means we need to take the complete > proposal, and then iteratively turn the spec into the one that matches it. That's my concern too. Since a lot of folks are referring an editor's draft directly, we should not break the *HEAD*. Let me try to update the spec iteratively as possible as we can. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 21 June 2013 06:55:22 UTC