- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:25:17 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23887 --- Comment #33 from Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org> --- (In reply to Olli Pettay from comment #32) > (In reply to Olli Pettay from comment #22) > > > > that node has 2nd SH as a child. Then for the 1st shadow tree the event path > > > > In this case, IP3 cannot select nodes which are distributed into IP1. > > Because IP1 is not a child node of 2nd SH. > > That means CHILD1's destination insertion point is [IP1], rather than [IP1, > > IP3]. > > Hmm, was my example wrong. Trying to find a better example. Yeah, it might be better to have a better example. Especially, I am curious whether we can create an example which hits the following case A): > A). In some shadow trees, an insertion point receives an event, but its parentNode doesn't receive an event. That's odd! If we can create an example which causes A), I think it might be worth to fix the current spec. > > > > Anyhow, there is still no example where non-final-destination insertion > points are needed in the event path and since this makes event propagation > inconsistent with the rest to the platform, there is no need to make this > special case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2013 13:25:19 UTC