- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 02:17:29 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23186
Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
CC| |bzbarsky@mit.edu
Resolution|FIXED |---
--- Comment #6 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> ---
> But I don't see the point of allowing this parameter to be non-null.
The point would be if there is code on the web that does that and doesn't
expect an exception.
Given that no UA throws on null here, I don't think the spec should require the
throwing behavior, unless you have some sort of indication that it is in fact
web-compatible. Which I doubt it is, frankly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2013 02:17:31 UTC