- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 02:18:42 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23946
Masatoshi Kimura <VYV03354@nifty.ne.jp> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |VYV03354@nifty.ne.jp
--- Comment #1 from Masatoshi Kimura <VYV03354@nifty.ne.jp> ---
Banning query part doesn't contradict with the generic URI syntax. The generic
syntax only defines the syntax. It doesn't affect the scheme-specific
semantics.
Blob URLs containing a query part is invalid just like HTTP URLs containing a
userinfo part. Although the fragment part is forbidden to have the
scheme-specific semantics [1], the query part is not.
BTW File API refers the URL Standard [2] rather than RFC 3986, although the
result is the same regarding the blob URL parsing.
[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3.5
> Fragment identifier semantics are independent of the
> URI scheme and thus cannot be redefined by scheme specifications.
[2] http://url.spec.whatwg.org/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 1 December 2013 02:18:44 UTC