- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 02:18:42 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23946 Masatoshi Kimura <VYV03354@nifty.ne.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |VYV03354@nifty.ne.jp --- Comment #1 from Masatoshi Kimura <VYV03354@nifty.ne.jp> --- Banning query part doesn't contradict with the generic URI syntax. The generic syntax only defines the syntax. It doesn't affect the scheme-specific semantics. Blob URLs containing a query part is invalid just like HTTP URLs containing a userinfo part. Although the fragment part is forbidden to have the scheme-specific semantics [1], the query part is not. BTW File API refers the URL Standard [2] rather than RFC 3986, although the result is the same regarding the blob URL parsing. [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3.5 > Fragment identifier semantics are independent of the > URI scheme and thus cannot be redefined by scheme specifications. [2] http://url.spec.whatwg.org/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 1 December 2013 02:18:44 UTC