- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 20:48:15 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22346
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Component|WebIDL |HTML
Resolution|FIXED |---
Assignee|cam@mcc.id.au |ian@hixie.ch
Product|WebAppsWG |WHATWG
Target Milestone|--- |Unsorted
QA Contact|public-webapps-bugzilla@w3. |contributor@whatwg.org
|org |
--- Comment #10 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> ---
Sounds good. I'm taking this back to do my side.
I guess I have to have a single "perform a security check" algorithm that then
defers to interface-specific algorithms if they exist, and is a noop otherwise.
What am I supposed to return? Or am I just supposed to throw if it fails, and
do nothing if it passes? It doesn't look like you check the return value or
handle exceptions (e.g. by aborting the calling algorithm) from this, but maybe
I'm missing some general rule for interpreting WebIDL algorithms.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2013 20:48:17 UTC