- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 20:48:15 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22346 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Component|WebIDL |HTML Resolution|FIXED |--- Assignee|cam@mcc.id.au |ian@hixie.ch Product|WebAppsWG |WHATWG Target Milestone|--- |Unsorted QA Contact|public-webapps-bugzilla@w3. |contributor@whatwg.org |org | --- Comment #10 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> --- Sounds good. I'm taking this back to do my side. I guess I have to have a single "perform a security check" algorithm that then defers to interface-specific algorithms if they exist, and is a noop otherwise. What am I supposed to return? Or am I just supposed to throw if it fails, and do nothing if it passes? It doesn't look like you check the return value or handle exceptions (e.g. by aborting the calling algorithm) from this, but maybe I'm missing some general rule for interpreting WebIDL algorithms. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2013 20:48:17 UTC