[Bug 22898] [Shadow]: Consider defining inertness in terms of the composed tree

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22898

--- Comment #1 from Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org> ---
Let me quote the my comment form another thread for reference :)

> In the current Shadow DOM spec, we haven't changed the meaning of ancestors/descendants. It's a relationship in a node tree.
>
> If we'd express a relationship in the composed tree, I am afraid we must say explicitly 'ancestors in the composed tree'.
>
> As for inertness, I've recently tried to re-define 'inertness' in the Shadow DOM spec, using the concept of the composed tree:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/shadow/index.html#focus-navigation
>
> But I am not confident about the definition of 'inertness', which is now only used in explaining 'Focus Navigation'.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 8 August 2013 02:15:44 UTC