- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 16:10:25 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22892 --- Comment #2 from Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #0) > Consider this situation: > > <style> p { color: green; } > <div id="foo"> > <style scoped> > p { color: red; } > </style> > </div> > <script> > var root = document.querySelector('#foo').createShadowRoot(); > root.innerHTML = "<content></content><p>What color am I?</p> > </script> > > My intuition tells me that we should simply disallow these shenanigans, and > the color of p is green. In other words, a scoped style that is a child of a > shadow host does not do anything. What's the effect of a scoped stylesheet in the shadow root itself? That still works, right? Have we fully clarified whether <content> is *replaced* by its matched light DOM, or just *filled* with it (and then doesn't render, via magic like "box:contents")? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 6 August 2013 16:10:30 UTC