- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 16:10:25 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22892
--- Comment #2 from Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Consider this situation:
>
> <style> p { color: green; }
> <div id="foo">
> <style scoped>
> p { color: red; }
> </style>
> </div>
> <script>
> var root = document.querySelector('#foo').createShadowRoot();
> root.innerHTML = "<content></content><p>What color am I?</p>
> </script>
>
> My intuition tells me that we should simply disallow these shenanigans, and
> the color of p is green. In other words, a scoped style that is a child of a
> shadow host does not do anything.
What's the effect of a scoped stylesheet in the shadow root itself? That still
works, right?
Have we fully clarified whether <content> is *replaced* by its matched light
DOM, or just *filled* with it (and then doesn't render, via magic like
"box:contents")?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 6 August 2013 16:10:30 UTC