- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 22:35:46 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21555 --- Comment #13 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> --- OK. I'm a little reluctant to suggest this as it means we then have three array-looking types, but: How about we have an IDL type named Array (and possibly Array<T>) which means "a reference to a modifiable array object" which in JS is a reference to a native Array object. If we care to keep the distinction between abstract IDL types and language binding specific types (I'm still trying to), we could define some operations that specs could invoke on such objects, like modifying array element values, changing length, creating a new object with a bunch of values, etc. For IndexedDB's use, we could start just with "creating a new object with a bunch of values". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 22:35:48 UTC