- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:05:37 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16707 --- Comment #3 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> 2012-04-12 17:05:36 UTC --- Right. The big question is whether explicit null passed should mean "missing". If it should, then we should have a nullable string here with null as default value and just have the prose talk about null. If it should not, then we should use [TreatUndefinedAs=Missing], probably have this be a non-nullable string, and the prose should talk about missing arguments. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2012 17:05:45 UTC