- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:17:22 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16303 --- Comment #19 from Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 2012-04-12 10:17:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #18) > We cannot start throwing for something we previously did not throw for. Also, I Why not? > do not see how it's easier as you would still have to parse the header whereas > you say a simpler pattern is used (which we could define, I don't mind). No, if you want to rewrite charset parameters, you need to parse the header. The spec, as written currently, assumes that these parsers are written in a way that a broken field can get parsed, and that information about duplicated parameters is returned. As far as I can tell, this doesn't reflect reality. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2012 10:17:29 UTC