- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:45:00 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16303 --- Comment #7 from Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 2012-04-12 08:44:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > What do you mean by "it" and what would removing "it" mean? I don't really care > that much what we do here, but I disagree that this is over-specification. > Multiple charset parameters is a legitimate situation that can come up and > implementors need to know what to do. things the spec says (last time I checked): a) rewrite Content-Type request header field, because XHR *will* use UTF-8 b) if original charset matched UTF-8, preserve it's exact representation (so don't rewrite "Utf-8" to "UTF-8") c) in addition, do that for all additional charset params So this is an edge case of an edge case of an edge case. Optimally, we can get rid of all of this; just declare that if the sender doesn't specify UTF-8, it's his problem (resulting in an inconsistent request). b) seems to be a workaround for one broken server seen in the past. Maybe it was fixed? c) over-specifies b) for the a broken input. Nobody implements it. Why do you care about this edge case in the first place? -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2012 08:45:07 UTC