- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 06:33:24 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16638 Summary: Define who owns what with MutationObserver Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DOM AssignedTo: annevk@opera.com ReportedBy: Olli.Pettay@gmail.com QAContact: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, jonas@sicking.cc, www-dom@w3.org, adamk@chromium.org, rafaelw@chromium.org Should MutationObserver own the nodes it is observing? I think not. If JS doesn't have a pointer to the node, it can't modify it. But if the original observe target is deleted, what should happen to the transient observers? I think they should still work (until the end of the microtask). That way GC/CC behavior isn't visible to the API user. Then MutationObserver object itself... I think the only way to hide GC/CC behavior is to keep MutationObserver object alive as long as the node(s) it is observing is/are alive. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2012 06:33:27 UTC