- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 13:47:40 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16608 --- Comment #4 from Ms2ger <Ms2ger@gmail.com> 2012-04-03 13:47:39 UTC --- Apologies. I would like to politely disagree with your comment. I think having to propagate exceptions every time you call into an algorithm is rather error-prone (as proved by the bug) and unnecessarily verbose for the default case. Also, it seems rather confusing to silently eat exceptions in this spec, while other specs like ES5, WebIDL and DOM4 do the opposite. (I'm not sure what HTML does, but I would be rather surprised if it mentioned every place where an exception could be thrown.) This way of throwing exceptions also matches how exceptions work in programming. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2012 13:47:42 UTC