- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 07:33:37 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16606 --- Comment #10 from Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@gmail.com> 2012-04-03 07:33:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > It feels odd if disconnect() returns the records. > > Is there any reason to not add deliver() now ? > > I'm not certain the specific behavior of deliver() you've described (i.e. it > calls the mutation observer) would work. e.g. what happens if the script calls > deliver() inside a mutation observer? Inside MutationObserver? You mean MutationObserver's callback? Well, if there are new records, the callback would be called again, if not, nothing would happen. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2012 07:33:44 UTC