- From: Sunava Dutta <sunavad@windows.microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:34:45 -0800
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Kris Zyp <kzyp@sitepen.com>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Kris Zyp <kris@sitepen.com>
- CC: Stewart Brodie <stewart.brodie@antplc.com>, "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
As Anne says, I think this would be better is it would be scoped to more than just XHR. -----Original Message----- From: public-webapi-request@w3.org [mailto:public-webapi-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Anne van Kesteren Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 3:02 PM To: Kris Zyp; Jonas Sicking; Kris Zyp Cc: Stewart Brodie; Web API WG (public) Subject: Re: Extra Connection Support Proposal On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:48:47 +0100, Kris Zyp <kzyp@sitepen.com> wrote: > I am going to send out another proposal that will hopefully be more > palatable/feasible. I don't want this in XMLHttpRequest. It makes no sense that only XMLHttpRequest would benefit from this. That doesn't help <video>, lots of external style sheets, images, etc. We need something helps all those APIs. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2008 23:34:20 UTC