- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 02:43:08 -0700
- To: Mike Wilson <mikewse@hotmail.com>
- Cc: public-webapi@w3.org
Mike Wilson wrote: > So my suggestion is to either do less, ie concentrating on the core > part of XHR and not mandating that not-so-important parts be in > place, so it will be less work to implement. > Or, add more functionality to the spec so the new XHR will be > "sexier" and will therefore give a "better bang for the buck" > invested. I think what we have *is* the core, not sure what less we could do that wouldn't turn the spec into a simple tutorial rather than a specification. We're also adding more functionality, XHR2 is in the works. / Jonas
Received on Friday, 28 September 2007 09:42:58 UTC