- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:44:39 -0700
- To: Web APIs WG <public-webapi@w3.org>
Cameron McCormack wrote: > Jonas Sicking: >> Yes, I definitely think this is needed. Current specifications use >> English descriptions in the ECMAScript bindings to accomplish that >> behavior to be specified, it would be much more easily detected and >> precisely described if we could use an extended attribute for this. > > Are there interfaces that you specifically don’t want to be able to > implement just with a function? It doesn't make much sense for interfaces that aren't callback interfaces. Also, interfaces that are expected to get more functions added in later versions would seem bad to make implementable as a function as the behavior would get very confusing when the later version of the spec is implemented. / Jonas
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2007 03:46:33 UTC