- From: Jon Ferraiolo <jferrai@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 16:43:12 -0700
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>, public-webapi@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF910223EC.3CE50F6F-ON882572D4.0081E08D-882572D4.00824C92@us.ibm.com>
Maciej, Maybe it's OK for the XHR spec itself to not require XML support, but instead have other higher-level document format specs such as HTML5 and/or some future version of SVG require that implementations support not only XHR but also XML over XHR. Within the XHR spec itself, perhaps there could be an informative comment that indicates that there is an expectation that, when used with languages such as HTML or SVG, XML support would be included. Jon Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> Sent by: To public-webapi-req Innovimax SARL uest@w3.org <innovimax@gmail.com> cc Anne van Kesteren 05/07/2007 04:16 <annevk@opera.com>, PM public-webapi@w3.org Subject Re: The XMLHttpRequest Object comments On May 7, 2007, at 3:11 PM, Innovimax SARL wrote: > I agree that it seems strange to have an "XML"HttpRequest that does > not support XML at all !! I don't necessarily agree with that, I can see that non-XML UAs may still want to support it only for transmitting text. But I think there should be a conformance class that does include the XML support, even if the baseline conforming implementation doesn't. Regards, Maciej
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
- image/gif attachment: pic24502.gif
- image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif
Received on Monday, 7 May 2007 23:43:57 UTC