- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:08:00 +0200
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- CC: Carsten Orthbandt <carsten@pixeltamer.net>, public-webapi@w3.org
Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Carsten Orthbandt wrote: >> Bjoern Hoehrmann schrieb: >>> Why don't you use less &, <, and ]]> sequences in the content and wrap >>> it into <x>...</x>? >> If my response body is (literal example) >> >> ---snip--- >> ut:7325 >> ubc:0 >> ---snap--- >> >> there's obviously some hesitation to wrap that as >> >> ---snip--- >> <?xml version="1.0"?> >> <x> >> ut:7325 >> ubc:0 >> </x> >> ---snap--- > > It would be sufficient to use <x>ut:7325,ubc:0</x>. The massive amount > of overhead generated by the connection setup and request and response > headers hardly compare to those 7 bytes. Or even <x ut="7325" ubc="0"/> , removing the need for a custom parser. Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 15 June 2007 09:08:20 UTC