- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:48:11 +0200
- To: Carsten Orthbandt <carsten@pixeltamer.net>
- CC: public-webapi@w3.org
Carsten Orthbandt wrote: > ... > The currently published version at http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/ > says in section 2.1 responseXML that > ... "Published" in the sense of "work in progress". Don't rely on these things. > ... > So what do I want? > > - I'd like to avoid the implied header overhead of Content-Type for protocols > that don't use XML. You're violating a SHOULD level requirement of HTTP/1.1 then. Sorry, but that's what you get for that :-). > - I definately dont want to see future browsers choke on that Actually, I'm tempted to say it would be good for the web if more UAs would flag missing content-type headers. > ... Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 15 June 2007 07:48:47 UTC