- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 04:04:54 -0700
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Cc: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, public-webapi <public-webapi@w3.org>
Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:20:37 +0200, Lachlan Hunt > <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au> wrote: > >> Would others accept changing the methods to cssQuery() and >> cssQueryOne()? If this would achieve concensus, I'd be willing to use >> these names. > > Opera does not like the cssQuery names and prefers the names that were > suggested in Lachy's draft. > > I recall strong objection to names which suggested this was about CSS in > the past (but maybe it was only Anne objecting) on the basis that this > isn't about CSS but selectors. > > So, Bjoern, Maciej, do you object to closing the issue with the names > Lachy proposed in his draft, or are you just tossing in another idea in > case it gets stronger consensus? I'm not really a big fan of anything containing 'css' either. But then again I don't think the length is as critical as many others seem to. Admittedly I'm not a big fan of the selectElement/selectAllElements suggestions either for the reasons maciej raised (similarities to selectNodes/selectSingleNode). How about selectorQuery/selectorQuerySingle/selectorQueryAll ? / Jonas
Received on Monday, 2 July 2007 11:05:02 UTC